IT’S HARD TO SHAKE A BAD NAME BUT IT WORKS: HIATUS HERNIA REPAIR
Why did John G., a man who has little faith in doctors, submit himself not only to an operation, but also to one that is regarded with suspicion by many in the medical profession? The reason is that John was desperate. For years he had endured stomach discomfort with heartburn, indigestion and reflux. In his 40s these symptoms seemed to worsen, but, being fit and otherwise healthy, he put up with them. As he approached 50, however, the pain became excruciating.
Sometimes the burning sensation in his food pipe was so extreme it would drive him to consume two rolls of Quick-Eze a day. He would drink a bottle of Mylanta a week and go through a box of bicarbonate of soda a month. When told surgery could help, he was sceptical. Although he had to sleep on a stack of pillows and his nights were repeatedly broken by reflux, pain, coughing and an awful taste in his mouth, he stayed away from doctors.
That was until he had to pull over while driving home along the freeway. Suddenly, along with the usual regurgitated food and acid, blood began coming up. His oesophagus was bleeding. Over the years, the valve between his stomach and oesophagus had lost pressure and allowed a constant wash-up of acid. This had become so acute that the acid had burned the lower end of his oesophagus raw.
The specialist was fairly blunt. John’s ulcerated oesophagus was in a pre-cancerous condition and he had two options. He could take a chance that his condition would not progress or have surgery to fix the faulty valve. Reluctantly, he agreed to the operation, known as a fundoplication, or a hiatus hernia repair. The outcome was astonishing.
’1 am now 1000 times better. The only minor adverse effects are that occasionally I burp and cannot control it. I can quieten it but cannot stop it. I also cannot eat huge meals,’ he says.
These hernias occur when the upper part of the stomach slips through the diaphragm and into the chest cavity. About 30 per cent of people over the age of 60 have one, and they become more common with age, although many remain symptom free.
Most of the people who seek a repair are 50-something males. Men seem to have more severe acid exposure. During the operation, part of the stomach is wrapped around the lower oesophagus to make the valve stronger. Until the seventies this was done through an open chest operation; between 1970 and 1990 it was done through the belly. Both operations took TA hours and required a 2-week stay in hospital. The success rate was variable, and was often no more than 60 per cent.
Complications resulted with patients not being able to swallow after surgery or suffering severe bloating. Consequently the operation acquired a bad name. Although the procedure has changed radically, old prejudices persist. While physicians often believe modern acid-suppressing drugs are infallible and make the operation unnecessary, a lot of general practitioners have not been re-educated about the new techniques.
Today the operation is done with a laparoscope in an hour. Two days later the man goes home, and he’s back at work in a week. Specialist surgeons who do this operation say that afterwards more than 90 per cent of patients are free of symptoms and have no intractable side effects. Less than 2 per cent get some bloating or trapped gas and about 1 per cent report a sensation of food sticking to the valve.
The typical patient who could benefit from such an operation has failed to obtain relief with acid-suppressing drugs and suffers severe heartburn, regurgitation, belching or coughing as reflux spills into the mouth and lungs. In the morning, such men often find their pillow stained brown with the residue of dribbled gastric contents.
*101\105\2*